It is interesting to see that Ruby developers […] seem to have all drank several cool-aids: Ruby/Rails/Apple MBPs/iPhones/TextMate. They are “green”, look to be “democratic”, wear sloppy clothes, and are “laid back”. They certainly fall into a few stereotypical descriptions. They religiously follow another big gorilla (Apple), whose policies are even more tight than that of Microsoft.
I can’t help but smirk at his remarks, thinking about a sarcastic comment I recently had by a Ruby developer. The remark was about jOOQ being legacy due to it being written in Java, not in Ruby… :-) In any case, I won’t go into judging languages or developers. I think, Igor’s opinion is interesting, because I share his thoughts about what he says concerning Java standardising too many things:
Standards – the biggest flop in the Java history was Java Enterprise. This does not require any explanation, I hope. Standards are a plague of Java. They are designed to make different implementations [work] together, but this is not happening. Instead, they take years to “standardize”, when Internet years are even shorter than dog years. There is a handful of low level good standards: JDBC, Servlets, JMS, but the rest is just a waste of time.
Igor has a strong opinion, and maybe neglects too many other good standards, such as XML, , the concurrency packages of Java 5, etc. But the more controversial standards also include EJB, JPA and most specifically the Criteria Query API, for which jOOQ aims to be a viable alternative. It’s surely be worth following Igor’s blog a little more. Read the full post here: