The Top 10 Productivity Booster Techs for Programmers

This is the list we’ve all been waiting for. The top 10 productivity booster techs for programmers that – once you’ve started using them – you can never do without them any longer.

Here it is:

1. Git

logo@2x Before, there were various version control systems. Better ones, worse ones. But somehow they all felt wrong in one way or another.

Came along Git (and GitHub, EGit). Once you’re using this miraculous tool, it’s hard to imagine that you’ll ever meet a better VCS again.

You’ve never used Git? Get started with this guide.

2. Stack Overflow


No kidding. Have you ever googled for anything tech-related back in 2005? Or altavista’d something back in 2000? Or went to FidoNet in search for answers in 1995? It was horrible. The top results always consisted in boring forum discussions with lots of un-experts and script kiddies claiming wrong things.

These forums still exist, but they don’t turn up on page 1 of Google search results.

Today, any time you search for something, you’ll have 2-3 hits per top 10 from Stack Overflow. And chances are, you’ll look no further because those answers are 80% wonderful! That’s partially because of Stack Overflow’s cunning reputation system, but also partially because of Stack Overflow’s even more cunning SEO rewarding system. (I already got 98 announcer, 19 booster, and 5 publicist badges. Yay).

While Stack Overflow allows its more active user to pursue their vanity (see above ;-) ), all the other users without any accounts will continue to flock in, finding perfect answers and clicking on very relevant ads.

Thumbs up for Stack Overflow and their awesome business model.

3. Office 365

excel We’re a small startup. Keeping costs low is of the essence. With Office 365, we only pay around $120 per user for a full-fledged Office 2013 suite, integrated with Microsoft Onedrive, Sharepoint, Exchange, Access, and much more.

In other words, we get enterprise-quality office software for the price of what students used to pay, before.

And do note, Office 2013 is better than any other Microsoft (or Libre) Office suite before. While not a 100% Programmer thing, it’s still an awesome tool chain for a very competitive price.

4. IntelliJ


While Eclipse is great (and free), IntelliJ IDEA, and also phpStorm for those unfortunate enough to write PHP are just subtly better in almost every aspect of an IDE. You can try their free community edition any time, but beware, you probably won’t switch back. And then you probably won’t be able to evade the Ultimate edition for long ;-)

5. PostgreSQL

pg PostgreSQL claims to be the world’s most advanced Open Source database, and we think it’s also one of the most elegant, easy, standards-compliant databases. It is really the one database that makes working with SQL fun.

We believe that within a couple of years, there’s a real chance of PostgreSQL not only beating commercial databases in terms of syntax but also in terms of performance.

Any time you need a data storage system with a slight preference for SQL-based ones, just make PostgreSQL your default choice. You won’t be missing any feature in that database.

Let’s hear it for PostgreSQL.

6. Java

duke Java is almost 20 years old, but it’s still the #1 or #2 language on the TIOBE index (sharing ranks with C), for very good reasons:

  • It’s robust
  • It’s mature
  • It works everywhere (almost, really too bad it has never succeeded in the browser)
  • It runs on the best platform ever, the JVM
  • It is Open Source
  • It has millions of tools, libraries, extensions, and applications

While some languages may seem a bit more modern or sexy or geeky, Java has and will always rule them all in terms of popularity. It is a first choice and with Java 8, things have improved even more.

7. jOOQ

jooq-logo-black-100x80 Now, learning this from the jOOQ blog is really unexpected and a shocker, but we think that jOOQ fits right into this programmer’s must-have top-10 tool chain. Most jOOQ users out there have never returned back to pre-jOOQ tools, as they’ve found writing SQL in Java as simple as never before.

Given that we’ve had Java and PostgreSQL before, there’s only this one missing piece gluing the two together in the most sophisticated way.

And besides, no one wants to hack around with the JDBC API, these days, do they?

8. Less CSS

less When you try Less CSS for the first time, you’ll think that

Why isn’t CSS itself like this!?

And you’re right. It feels just like CSS the way it should have always been. All the things that you have always hated about CSS (repetitiveness, verbosity, complexity) are gone. And if you’re using phpStorm or some other JetBrains product (see above), you don’t even have to worry about compiling it to CSS.

As an old HTML-table lover who doesn’t care too much about HTML5, layout, and all that, using Less CSS makes me wonder if I should finally dare creating more fancy websites!

Never again without Less CSS.

9. jQuery

jqueryWhat Less CSS is for CSS, jQuery is for JavaScript. Heck, so many junior developers on Stack Overflow don’t even realise that jQuery is just a JavaScript library. They think it is the language, because we’ve grown to use it all over the place.

Yes, sometimes, jQuery can be overkill as is indicated by this slightly cynical website:

joox-logo-blackBut it helps so much abstracting all the DOM manipulation in a very fluent way. If only all libraries were written this way.

Do note that we’ve also published a similar library for Java, in case you’re interested in jQuery-style DOM XML manipulation. Along with Java 8’s new lambda expressions, manipulating the DOM becomes a piece of cake.

10. C8H10N4O2

764px-Caffeine.svgC8H10N4O2 (more commonly known as Caffeine) is probably the number one productivity booster for programmers.

Some may claim that there’s such a thing like the Ballmer Peak. That might be true, but the Caffeine Peak has been proven times and again.

Have Dilbert’s view on the matter:

More productivity boosters

We’re certainly not the only ones believing that there is such a thing as a programmer-productivity-booster. Enjoy this alternative list by Troy Topnik here for more insight:

Java 8 Friday: The Dark Side of Java 8

At Data Geekery, we love Java. And as we’re really into jOOQ’s fluent API and query DSL, we’re absolutely thrilled about what Java 8 will bring to our ecosystem.

Java 8 Friday

Every Friday, we’re showing you a couple of nice new tutorial-style Java 8 features, which take advantage of lambda expressions, extension methods, and other great stuff. You’ll find the source code on GitHub.

The dark side of Java 8

So far, we’ve been showing the thrilling parts of this new major release. But there are also caveats. Lots of them. Things that

  • … are confusing
  • … are wrong
  • … are omitted (for now)
  • … are omitted (for long)

There are always two sides to Java major releases. On the bright side, we get lots of new functionality that most people would say was overdue. Other languages, platforms have had generics long before Java 5. Other languages, platforms have had lambdas long before Java 8. But now, we finally have these features. In the usual quirky Java-way.

Lambda expressions were introduced quite elegantly. The idea of being able to write every anonymous SAM instance as a lambda expression is very compelling from a backwards-compatiblity point of view. So what are the dark sides to Java 8?

Overloading gets even worse

Overloading, generics, and varargs aren’t friends. We’ve explained this in a previous article, and also in this Stack Overflow question. These might not be every day problems in your odd application, but they’re very important problems for API designers and maintainers.

With lambda expressions, things get “worse”. So you think you can provide some convenience API, overloading your existing run() method that accepts a Callable to also accept the new Supplier type:

static <T> T run(Callable<T> c) throws Exception {

static <T> T run(Supplier<T> s) throws Exception {
    return s.get();

What looks like perfectly useful Java 7 code is a major pain in Java 8, now. Because you cannot just simply call these methods with a lambda argument:

public static void main(String[] args)
throws Exception {
    run(() -> null);
    //  ^^^^^^^^^^ ambiguous method call

Tough luck. You’ll have to resort to either of these “classic” solutions:

    run((Callable<Object>) (() -> null));
    run(new Callable<Object>() {
        public Object call() throws Exception {
            return null;

So, while there’s always a workaround, these workarounds always “suck”. That’s quite a bummer, even if things don’t break from a backwards-compatibility perspective.

Not all keywords are supported on default methods

Default methods are a nice addition. Some may claim that Java finally has traits. Others clearly dissociate themselves from the term, e.g. Brian Goetz:

The key goal of adding default methods to Java was “interface evolution”, not “poor man’s traits.”

As found on the lambda-dev mailing list.

Fact is, default methods are quite a bit of an orthogonal and irregular feature to anything else in Java. Here are a couple of critiques:

They cannot be made final

Given that default methods can also be used as convenience methods in API:

public interface NoTrait {

    // Run the Runnable exactly once
    default final void run(Runnable r) {
        //  ^^^^^ modifier final not allowed
        run(r, 1);

    // Run the Runnable "times" times
    default void run(Runnable r, int times) {
        for (int i = 0; i < times; i++)

Unfortunately, the above is not possible, and so the first overloaded convenience method could be overridden in subtypes, even if that makes no sense to the API designer.

They cannot be made synchronized

Bummer! Would that have been difficult to implement in the language?

public interface NoTrait {
    default synchronized void noSynchronized() {
        //  ^^^^^^^^^^^^ modifier synchronized
        //  not allowed

Yes, synchronized is used rarely, just like final. But when you have that use-case, why not just allow it? What makes interface method bodies so special?

The default keyword

This is maybe the weirdest and most irregular of all features. The default keyword itself. Let’s compare interfaces and abstract classes:

// Interfaces are always abstract
public /* abstract */ interface NoTrait {

    // Abstract methods have no bodies
    // The abstract keyword is optional
    /* abstract */ void run1();

    // Concrete methods have bodies
    // The default keyword is mandatory
    default void run2() {}

// Classes can optionally be abstract
public abstract class NoInterface {

    // Abstract methods have no bodies
    // The abstract keyword is mandatory
    abstract void run1();

    // Concrete methods have bodies
    // The default keyword mustn't be used
    void run2() {}

If the language were re-designed from scratch, it would probably do without any of abstract or default keywords. Both are unnecessary. The mere fact that there is or is not a body is sufficient information for the compiler to assess whether a method is abstract. I.e, how things should be:

public interface NoTrait {
    void run1();
    void run2() {}

public abstract class NoInterface {
    void run1();
    void run2() {}

The above would be much leaner and more regular. It’s a pity that the usefulness of default was never really debated by the EG. Well, it was debated but the EG never wanted to accept this as an option. I’ve tried my luck, with this response:

I don’t think #3 is an option because interfaces with method bodies are unnatural to begin with. At least specifying the “default” keyword gives the reader some context why the language allows a method body. Personally, I wish interfaces would remain as pure contracts (without implementation), but I don’t know of a better option to evolve interfaces.

Again, this is a clear commitment by the EG not to commit to the vision of “traits” in Java. Default methods were a pure necessary means to implement 1-2 other features. They weren’t well-designed from the beginning.

Other modifiers

Luckily, the static modifier made it into the specs, late in the project. It is thus possible to specifiy static methods in interfaces now. For some reason, though, these methods do not need (nor allow!) the default keyword, which must’ve been a totally random decision by the EG, just like you apparently cannot define static final methods in interfaces.

While visibility modifiers were discussed on the lambda-dev mailing list, but were out of scope for this release. Maybe, we can get them in a future release.

Few default methods were actually implemented

Some methods would have sensible default implementations on interface – one might guess. Intuitively, the collections interfaces, like List or Set would have them on their equals() and hashCode() methods, because the contract for these methods is well-defined on the interfaces. It is also implemented in AbstractList, using listIterator(), which is a reasonable default implementation for most tailor-made lists.

It would’ve been great if these API were retrofitted to make implementing custom collections easier with Java 8. I could make all my business objects implement List for instance, without wasting the single base-class inheritance on AbstractList.

Probably, though, there has been a compelling reason related to backwards-compatibility that prevented the Java 8 team at Oracle from implementing these default methods. Whoever sends us the reason why this was omitted will get a free jOOQ sticker :-)

The wasn’t invented here – mentality

This, too, was criticised a couple of times on the lambda-dev EG mailing list. And while writing this blog series, I can only confirm that the new functional interfaces are very confusing to remember. They’re confusing for these reasons:

Some primitive types are more equal than others

The int, long, double primitive types are preferred compared to all the others, in that they have a functional interface in the java.util.function package, and in the whole Streams API. boolean is a second-class citizen, as it still made it into the package in the form of a BooleanSupplier or a Predicate, or worse: IntPredicate.

All the other primitive types don’t really exist in this area. I.e. there are no special types for byte, short, float, and char. While the argument of meeting deadlines is certainly a valid one, this quirky status-quo will make the language even harder to learn for newbies.

The types aren’t just called Function

Let’s be frank. All of these types are simply “functions”. No one really cares about the implicit difference between a Consumer, a Predicate, a UnaryOperator, etc.

In fact, when you’re looking for a type with a non-void return value and two arguments, what would you probably be calling it? Function2? Well, you were wrong. It is called a BiFunction.

Here’s a decision tree to know how the type you’re looking for is called:

  • Does your function return void? It’s called a Consumer
  • Does your function return boolean? It’s called a Predicate
  • Does your function return an int, long, double? It’s called XXToIntYY, XXToLongYY, XXToDoubleYY something
  • Does your function take no arguments? It’s called a Supplier
  • Does your function take a single int, long, double argument? It’s called an IntXX, LongXX, DoubleXX something
  • Does your function take two arguments? It’s called BiXX
  • Does your function take two arguments of the same type? It’s called BinaryOperator
  • Does your function return the same type as it takes as a single argument? It’s called UnaryOperator
  • Does your function take two arguments of which the first is a reference type and the second is a primitive type? It’s called ObjXXConsumer (only consumers exist with that configuration)
  • Else: It’s called Function

Good lord! We should certainly go over to Oracle Education to check if the price for Oracle Certified Java Programmer courses have drastically increased, recently… Thankfully, with Lambda expressions, we hardly ever have to remember all these types!

More on Java 8

Java 5 generics have brought a lot of great new features to the Java language. But there were also quite a few caveats related to type erasure. Java 8’s default methods, Streams API and lambda expressions will again bring a lot of great new features to the Java language and platform. But we’re sure that Stack Overflow will soon burst with questions by confused programmers that are getting lost in the Java 8 jungle.

Learning all the new features won’t be easy, but the new features (and caveats) are here to stay. If you’re a Java developer, you better start practicing now, when you get the chance. Because we have a long way to go.

Nonetheless, thigns are exciting, so stay tuned for more exciting Java 8 stuff published in this blog series.

Are you in for another critique about Java 8? Read “New Parallelism APIs in Java 8: Behind the Glitz and Glamour” by the guys over

jOOQ Newsletter: April 2, 2014

subscribe to this newsletter here

Tweet of the Day

Our customers, users, and followers are sharing their love for jOOQ to the world. Here are:

Arturo Tena who simply loves jOOQ 3.3, and expresses this with a creative transformation of our version numbering scheme:

Florin T.Pătraşcu who cannot stop integrating jOOQ with MicroMVC, because he discovers more and more new features all the time:

Thanks for the shouts, guys!

New license models – available soon

In the early days of migrating towards dual-licensing, we’ve discussed many alternative licensing models with our long-term users and early adopters. Now, we’re almost ready to publish the new, additional license terms, which are due for next week. They essentially include:

  • The existing yearly subscription for default use-cases
  • A new monthly subscription for short-running tasks, such as DB migrations
  • A new major release perpetual license for long-running jOOQ integrations with little need for upgrades

With these options, we believe that we will be able to cover even more jOOQ integration use-cases from a legal perspective, helping to further improve your jOOQ experience.

Are you an existing customer of the jOOQ yearly subscription interested in a switch to other terms? Do not hesitate to contact sales for a tailor-made migration offer.

Java Zone – Java 8 is out

Java 8 has finally been released by Oracle, a moment we’ve been waiting for quite a while now. Unsurprisingly, blogs in all corners of the web have started publishing Java and Java 8 related articles. We absolutely agree with Craig Buckler claiming Java to be the best programming language to learn in 2014.

Want to stay up to date with examples, tutorials, insights on Java 8? Follow ourJava 8 Friday blog series, then. Every Friday, we’re publishing an insightful article on a specific area of Java that will be affected by Java 8. One of the most interesting articles that has even caught the attention of Erik Meijer is Dr. Ming-Yee Iu’s guest post about JINQ and JINQ-to-jOOQ, which you should be looking out for in the next 6 months.

For more great resources, see also our blogging partner’s Java 8 resources collection.

SQL Zone – In-Memory Computing

Do you know your fastest way around in-memory computing with Oracle? It’s possible, but it’s not so trivial.

If you’re used to SQL Server, you would simply create a T-SQL temporary table, which is a typesafe in-memory table for use with procedural T-SQL.

In Oracle, you have two choices to do the same:

  • Using SQL TABLE OF OBJECT types

In almost all cases, GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLEs will outperform TABLE OF OBJECT types for a very simple reason: You can perform all operations in the SQL engine only, whereas with TABLE OF OBJECT types, you will have to resort to the PL/SQL engine to keep the table in memory. With significant amounts of data, this can become quite a problem.

Want to know more? Visit our recent Stack Overflow question on the subject.

Upcoming Events

Have you missed any of our previous jOOQ talks? Soon you’ll get another chance to hear us talk about jOOQ or SQL in general in any of these upcoming events:

Stay informed about 2014 events on

Spring API Bingo

For the occasion of today’s date, I’ve just invented a fun game. The Spring API Bingo! How does it work?

Let us write the following little piece of code:

public class SpringAPIBingo {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        // Any similarities with actual API
        // (e.g. that of Spring) are completely 
        // accidental
        List<String> terms = Arrays.asList(

        // [...]

So far so good. We could use more terms if we wanted to but for now, these will suffice.

Now, let’s shuffle the above list and create names of length 2-5 terms. Easy as pie. We’re using Java 8 for this. So our programme above continues like so:

        // [...]


        for (int i = 0; i < 25; i++) {
            if (i > 0 && i % 5 == 0)


                     .limit((long) (2 + 
                          Math.random() * 4))



As you can see, the above generates a 5×5 HTML table of random names. As this blog is not wide enough for a 5×5 table, let’s break down the table for readability purposes:

Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
Column 4
Column 5

Now, let’s go visit the Spring Javadoc. We’ll take version 4.0’s allclasses page for optimal winning chances. Go back to your 5×5 table and mark all matches.

Now let’s check if we have 5 matches in a row, bingo!

Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
Column 4
Column 5

Only four hits. Better luck next time.

Next week: Facebook Bingo

We’ll write down 25 tech companies in a 5×5 grid. Then wait until Facebook buys new companies. If you got 5 in a row – Bingo!