A problem few developers are aware of is the possibility of running into “cursor cache contention” or “execution plan cache contention” problems when using IN lists in SQL. The problem that is described in lengths in previous articles, can be summarised as this.

All of these are distinct SQL queries and need to be parsed / planned / cached as possibly distinct execution plans in RDBMS that have strong plan caches (e.g. Db2, Oracle, SQL Server):

```
SELECT * FROM t WHERE id IN (?);
SELECT * FROM t WHERE id IN (?, ?);
SELECT * FROM t WHERE id IN (?, ?, ?);
SELECT * FROM t WHERE id IN (?, ?, ?, ?);
SELECT * FROM t WHERE id IN (?, ?, ?, ?, ?);
```

While this is *never *a problem on developer machines, this can produce *significant *problems in production. I’ve seen this take down entire Oracle instances during peak loads. While RDBMS vendors should work on avoiding the severe problems this can cause, you can work around it using a trick that we invented at jOOQ (and Hibernate also has it now):

### IN list padding

The trick is very simple. Just “pad” your `IN`

lists to the nearest power of `2`

, and repeat the last value until the end:

```
SELECT * FROM t WHERE id IN (?); -- Left as it is
SELECT * FROM t WHERE id IN (?, ?); -- Left as it is
SELECT * FROM t WHERE id IN (?, ?, ?, ?); -- Padded 3 to 4
SELECT * FROM t WHERE id IN (?, ?, ?, ?); -- Left as it is
SELECT * FROM t WHERE id IN (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?); -- Padded 5 to 8
```

It’s really a hack and there are better solutions to avoiding this problem, including using arrays or temporary tables, but your production system may be down and you need a quick fix.

jOOQ has supported `IN`

list padding for years now, since jOOQ 3.9 (late 2016), but with the relatively new parser and the `ParsingConnection`

, you can now also apply this technique to any arbitrary SQL query in your non-jOOQ based system. Here’s a simple example:

```
// Any arbitrary JDBC Connection is wrapped by jOOQ here and replaced
// by a "ParsingConnection", which is also a JDBC Connection
DSLContext ctx = DSL.using(connection);
ctx.settings().setInListPadding(true);
Connection c = ctx.parsingConnection();
// Your remaining code is left untouched. It is unaware of jOOQ
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
try (PreparedStatement s = c.prepareStatement(
// This alone is reason enough to use jOOQ instead,
// but one step at a time :)
"select 1 from dual where 1 in (" +
IntStream.rangeClosed(0, i)
.mapToObj(x -> "?")
.collect(Collectors.joining(", ")) +
")")
) {
for (int j = 0; j <= i; j++)
s.setInt(j + 1, j + 1);
try (ResultSet rs = s.executeQuery()) {
while (rs.next())
System.out.println(rs.getInt(1));
}
}
}
```

The above example just generates and runs 10 queries of this form:

```
select 1 from dual where 1 in (?)
select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?)
select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?)
select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?)
select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
```

But that’s not what is being executed. In the DEBUG logs, we can see the following:

Translating from : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?) Translating to : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?) Translating from : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?) Translating to : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?) Translating from : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?) Translating to : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?) Translating from : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?) Translating to : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?) Translating from : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?) Translating to : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) Translating from : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) Translating to : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) Translating from : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) Translating to : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) Translating from : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) Translating to : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) Translating from : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) Translating to : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) Translating from : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) Translating to : select 1 from dual where 1 in (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)

And just like that, our legacy application can run in production again, and you’ll have time to fix this more thoroughly.

### Conclusion

While jOOQ is mostly an internal DSL for writing type safe, embedded SQL in Java, you can use it for a lot of other things too on any JDBC based application. The above example is using the `ParsingConnection`

that can parse all your SQL statements and translate / transform them to anything else, including other dialects.